Thomas Cook

  • 1870-1900

now Ludgate House

107-111 Fleet Street, EC4
Built: 1872-73 – extended 1906
Architect: Horace Gundy
Location: Fleet Street
Listing: not listed

The former offices of Thomas Cook retain most of their original details and 1906 additions.

The former office of Thomas Cook are a good example of high-Victorian use of applied sculptural ornament to relieve mass but also to communicate purpose as shown by the references to travel displayed by the cherubs over the Fleet Street entrances, for instance.  The original portion was a concave-plan building of just nine window bays and faced squarely onto Ludgate Circus, itself created 64-69 when the Holborn viaduct scheme was implemented.  In 1906, as Thomas Cook needed more space, the building was extended along Fleet Street by another ten window bays.  It is likely that the dome surmounting the central bay on Ludgate Circus was added at this time, as early images do not feature this element.

Travel-themed cherubs poring over maps and navigation instruments.

Details include richly aedicualted entrances at Nos. 107 and 111, one with scrolled and the other with triangular pediment; cast iron balcony and decorated window lintels along the whole of the third storey and alternating stone balustrades and balconies on the fourth. There are further sculptural groups just below the cornice.  The dome is surmounted by a trio of cherubs that formerly supported a globe and a weathervane.  An oft-reported curiosity about this building is that it still contains one of the oldest operational lifts in London which was featured in a fight scene in the James Bond “Diamonds are Forever” film.

Detail of the dome, probably added in 1906.

Thomas Cook began his activity by organising railway transport for temperance movement supporters going to meetings.  According to their website the “first commercial venture took place in the summer of 1845, when he organised a trip to Liverpool. This was a far more ambitious project than anything he had previously attempted, and he made his preparations with great thoroughness. Not content with simply providing tickets at low prices – 15 shillings for first-class passengers and 10 shillings for second, [Cook] also investigated the route and published a handbook of the journey. This 60-page booklet was a forerunner of the modern holiday brochure.”  The company grew rapidly and was instrumental to opening foreign travel to the rising middle class, first in Europe and later further aboard.  Among other achievements, Thomas’ son, John, handled the entire logistics chain of the 1884 military expedition to rescue General Gordon, in Khartoum. This involved moving 18,000 troops and 80,000 tons of cargo.

A period poster advertising Thomas Cook’s services.
Third-storey detail.

10 thoughts on “Thomas Cook”

  1. I think that means “good article”? Thanks.
    It occurred to em that this article was posted very close in time to the lamentable bankruptcy of the Thomas Cook company; an unfortunate coincidence.

  2. I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was good.
    I do not know who you are but definitely you are going to a famous
    blogger if you are not already 😉 Cheers!

  3. I’m not sure why but this blog is loading very slow for me.
    Is anyone else having this issue or is it a problem
    on my end? I’ll check back later and see if the problem still exists.

  4. It’always possible that WordPress servers were heavily trafficked or undergoing an update but not normally slow. Do bear in mind many of the images are quite large.

  5. Greetings from California! I’m bored to tears at work so I decided to browse your website on my iphone
    during lunch break. I love the information you present here
    and can’t wait to take a look when I get home.
    I’m shocked at how quick your blog loaded on my cell phone
    .. I’m not even using WIFI, just 3G .. Anyways, very good site!

  6. Hey just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The words in your post seem to be running off
    the screen in Opera. I’m not sure if this is a formatting issue or something to do with web
    browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know.
    The design and style look great though! Hope you get
    the problem fixed soon. Many thanks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *